THE BLUES-L FAQ LIST—Administrative Portion
List Owner—David Pimmel
Compiled by David Silberberg
Last modified March 12, 1995
Contents:
To Subscribe: | SUBSCRIBE BLUES-L |
To Unsubscribe: | UNSUBSCRIBE BLUES-L |
The BLUES-L FAQ List—Content, Controversies and Other Information
List Owner—David Pimmel
Compiled by David Silberberg
Last modified March 12, 1995
Contents:
message to: | mxserver@wkuvx1.wku.edu |
message: | subscribe harp-l “your real name” |
message to: | listserv@templevm.bitnet |
message to: | slowhand-request@daacdev1.stx.com |
message: | subscribe |
Subscription information:
Living Blues Hill Hall Room 301 University of Mississippi University, MS 38677 |
One year subscriptions:
US - $18 Canada - $22 Overseas - $32 |
Subscription information:
Blues Revue Rt. 2, Box 188 West Union, WV 23456 |
One year subscriptions:
US and Canada - $20 Overseas - $30 |
Blues Access
1455 Chest Place Boulder, CO 80304-3153 |
One year subscriptions:
US - $24 Canada - $26 Overseas - $28 Asia and Australia - $32 |
As with any good, high-volume list or newsgroup, Blues-L has its share of unsolvable and continually recurring controversies. Unfortunately, the discussion of these topics typically leads to flame wars, name calling, personal attacks, and, in general, messages sent to Blues-L that stray far from the topic of the Blues. The most controversial topics have something to do with white / black issues.
As we would like to limit the number of messages to this high-volume list that have little or no blues content, please be careful about the following subjects:
One theory says that because the music grew out of the specific Black experience in America (primarily the South), only African-Americans are the true inheritors of the tradition, only they can truly understand the culture that spawned the Blues, and only they can be true blues-men (and women). Caucasians (and, by extension, Asians, Hispanics, etc.) can only interpret the music, master its form, but not its power.
Opposed to this is the theory that it is the music that is critical, that everyone has the blues feeling, and that the Blues transcends race and culture. Clapton, Vaughan, Winter, etc. are true blues musicians who take the music to new and more relevant places. This theory also incorporates, for some, the legitimacy of hip-hop, alternative, etc. music as the inheritor of the blues tradition.
This is actually a three-sided controversy, much of which relates to (A) above):
While falling short of “Clapton Is God” rhetoric, many of our contributors believe that Clapton is (the best/one of the best/and excellent) blues guitarist and performer, and that From the Cradle (Clapton’s recent blues CD) ranks with the best recorded product.
The opposite side of the argument is that Clapton would receive no credit as a bluesman if he weren’t white and already popular with white American and European audiences. Many of our contributors resent Clapton’s enormous popularity and material rewards when more deserving black artists are not recognized, have been cheated out of royalties and other moneys due them, and in general have been forced to live itinerant lives eking out a meagre living by playing their heart-felt music.
In the middle are those that say, yes, Clapton is a good blues guitarist, but are disappointed in From the Cradle: it is too derivative, merely covering arrangements originated by other black performers, and not adding anything to the genre. This opinion holds that Clapton is good, and should have done more with his breakthrough (to the blues scene) CD.
On one side, these groups are praised as having piqued the interest of white Americans and Europeans in the blues, leading them to the real blues.
The other side says that these white groups merely ripped off the black musicians who created the music. Particularly Led Zeppelin, but not limited to them, they took credit (and royalties) for the songs, credit that should have gone to the black originators of the songs, and only belatedly (and reluctantly) recognized their influences in public.
Fortunately, we don’t seem to get sidetracked too much on these issues. Obviously, blue-zellers have preferences, and express those preferences on the list: this is certainly an acceptable practice, particularly if reasons are given. We have some excellent amateur (and professional) reviewers amongst our contributors who lay it on the line, both good and bad, about a particular artist or performance. The best of them (which is to say, fortunately for all of us, most of them) stay away from personal attacks on the artists involved, and responses to critics of their critiques. We need reviews, counter reviews, opinions, facts, arguments—but not flame wars.
THE BLUES-L FAQ—Etiquette and Guidelines Portion
List Owner—David Pimmel
Compiled by David
Silberberg
Last modified March 12, 1995
Any additions, suggestions, or corrections should be mailed to David
Silberberg
Contents:
Please read it before posting any message to the list / newsgroup.
Blues-L is not censored in any way. All messages will be posted to the list. But this is a list devoted to discussion of the blues, and this is a community of blues-lovers and people interested in the form. Over 750 people, from all over the world, subscribe to the mail list; countless others read the newsgroup without subscribing. We hope you will follow these simple guidelines, so that Blues-L will be a happier, friendlier place to be.